Skip to main content
· 3/8/2005

In Re Salomon Analyst Litigation

Citations

  • 373 F. Supp. 2d 252
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3629
  • 2005 WL 550847

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • extending a stay partially based on intervening caselaw that “represent[ed] a major effort to clarify the doctrine,” which had been “in some disarray,” “in a context relevant to th[at] case”
  • “[D]efendants’ assertion that the law is well established that successive motions do stay discovery under the PSLRA . . . is, to say the least, overstated.” (quotation marks and modification omitted) (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.