Camelot Event Driven Fund v. Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that family-owned grocery store did not violate § 12112(d)(4)(A
• suggesting that the danger of HIV transmission through contact with blood was so well-known that it was unnecessary to consult a medical professional to determine if an examination was necessary
• approving use of medical examination for HIV-positive grocery store employee who regularly used knives and was susceptible to cuts and scrapes while working
• stating an employer could order an examination on the basis of expert testimony that employee was a direct threat alone
• “[T]he statute was intended to prevent against ‘medical tests and inquiries that do not serve a legitimate business purpose.’” (quoting 29 C.F.R. § 1630.13(b))
• “[T]he statute was intended to prevent against ‘medical tests and inquiries that do not serve a legitimate business purpose.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).