California Supreme Court· 8/1/1974
In Re Russell
Citations
- 524 P.2d 1295
- 12 Cal. 3d 229
- 115 Cal. Rptr. 511
- 1974 Cal. LEXIS 223
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Extradition is an even more preliminary step in a criminal proceeding than the filing of an indictment....”
- dicta citing with approval holding in People v. Uhlemann, 9 Cal.3d 662, 108 Cal.Rptr. 657, 511 P.2d 609 (1973), that state may prosecute under an indictment after a complaint against the defendant has been dismissed
- dicta citing with approval holding in People v. Uhlemann, 9 Cal.3d 662, 108 Cal. Rptr. 657, 511 P.2d 609 (1973), that state may prosecute under an indictment after a complaint against the defendant has been dismissed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Wright, McComb, Tobriner, Burke, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Levy v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1977-03-17· cited 109×
- Mattson v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-06-02· cited 63×
- Stockwell v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1977-12-02· cited 57×
- De Weese v. UnickCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-02-13· cited 45×
- Ellena v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-04-22· cited 43×
- Merry v. Coast Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-09-25· cited 41×
- Bardomiano Aguilar & Rosa Aguilar, Etc. v. Los Angeles County, L.A. county/u.s.c. Medical CenterNinth Circuit· 1985-01-15· cited 39×
- People v. GephartCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-06-12· cited 39×
- People v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-12-04· cited 29×
- Columbus Line, Inc. v. Gray Line Sight-Seeing Companies Associated, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1981-05-18· cited 27×
- Flood v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1975-02-28· cited 25×
- Harman v. Mono General HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-05-10· cited 24×
- Larry C. Iverson, Inc. v. BoumaMontana Supreme Court· 1981-11-17· cited 23×
- Smith v. Walter E. Heller & Co.California Court of Appeal· 1978-06-13· cited 20×
- In Re CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-01-02· cited 20×
- People v. CoyleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1982-11-22· cited 18×
- People v. SilerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-06-16· cited 17×
- In Re GoldenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-01-07· cited 13×
- Lopez v. KingC.D. California· 1983-02-07· cited 13×
- People v. Superior Court (Smolin)California Supreme Court· 1986-05-01· cited 10×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-03-06· cited 895×
- Appleyard v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1906-12-03· cited 229×
- People v. UhlemannCalifornia Supreme Court· 1973-07-02· cited 169×
- South Carolina v. BaileySupreme Court· 1933-05-22· cited 157×
- Matter of StraussSupreme Court· 1905-04-03· cited 109×
- In Re CrowCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-04-26· cited 93×
- Martin v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-06-26· cited 75×
- People v. Van EykCalifornia Supreme Court· 1961-08-10· cited 69×
- United States Ex Rel. Rutz v. LevySupreme Court· 1925-05-25· cited 55×
- In Re CooperCalifornia Supreme Court· 1960-03-04· cited 36×
- In Re KimlerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-07-13· cited 22×
- In Re BailleauxCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-10-31· cited 17×
- In Re MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1966-09-16· cited 14×
- In Re McBrideCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1953-01-27· cited 11×
- In Re BrewerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1943-11-17· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.