· 5/25/1925
United States Ex Rel. Rutz v. Levy
Citations
- 268 U.S. 390
- 69 L. Ed. 1010
- 45 S. Ct. 516
- 1925 U.S. LEXIS 576
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a commissioners’ decision in a removal hearing is not given res judicata effect, but may be persuasive in a second removal hearing
- principles of double jeopardy “are not implicated” before the point at which jeopardy attaches
- “[T]he discharge of an accused person upon a preliminary examination for want of probable cause constitutes no bar to a subsequent preliminary examination before another magistrate. Such an examination is not a trial in any sense and does not operate to put the defendant in jeopardy.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sutherland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.