Skip to main content
· 5/25/1925

United States Ex Rel. Rutz v. Levy

Citations

  • 268 U.S. 390
  • 69 L. Ed. 1010
  • 45 S. Ct. 516
  • 1925 U.S. LEXIS 576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a commissioners’ decision in a removal hearing is not given res judicata effect, but may be persuasive in a second removal hearing
  • principles of double jeopardy “are not implicated” before the point at which jeopardy attaches
  • “[T]he discharge of an accused person upon a preliminary examination for want of probable cause constitutes no bar to a subsequent preliminary examination before another magistrate. Such an examination is not a trial in any sense and does not operate to put the defendant in jeopardy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sutherland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.