Skip to main content

Citations

  • 182 S.W.3d 424
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 10542
  • 2005 WL 3484198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that it is not enough that ninety days of residence in county will pass during pen-dency of proceeding
  • stating that it is not enough that ninety days of residence in county will pass during pendency of proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCALL, Strange, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.