In Re Ross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• listing a value as “unknown” for an exemption in spousal and child support is ineffective

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Alderman v. Martinson (In Re Alderman)
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-03-29· cited 15×
• Morgan-Busby v. Gladstone (In Re Morgan-Busby)
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-01-07· cited 15×
• Gilbert v. Zimmer (In Re Gilbert)
  S.D. Ohio· 1993-05-20· cited 14×
• In Re Bell
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1995-03-07· cited 9×
• In Re Davis
  S.D. Ohio· 1994-05-06· cited 9×
• Martinson v. Michael (In Re Michael)
  D. Montana· 1995-08-14· cited 5×
• In Re Edwards
  S.D. Ohio· 2000-10-04· cited 3×
• Bradford Furniture Co. v. Storey (In re Storey)
  M.D. Tennessee· 1994-09-27· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Menasche
  Supreme Court· 1955-04-04· cited 1,032×
• Jerry Payne and Deborah Payne, Debtors-Appellants v. Charles R. Wood, Jr.
  Seventh Circuit· 1985-10-18· cited 147×
• Hyman v. Plotkin (In Re Hyman)
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-02-12· cited 53×
• Andermahr v. Barrus (In Re Andermahr)
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-05-23· cited 46×
• Gardner v. Johnson
  Ninth Circuit· 1952-03-22· cited 23×
• Moore v. Moore
  California Court of Appeal· 1955-05-18· cited 14×
• Zaragoza v. Zaragoza
  California Court of Appeal· 1941-11-25· cited 12×
• Triest v. Triest
  California Court of Appeal· 1944-12-18· cited 12×
• In Re DeVries
  N.D. New York· 1987-06-29· cited 5×
• Payne v. Wood
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-24· cited 3×