In re Richter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the debtor had no obligation to pay the redemption price, the tax purchaser did not hold a claim because there was no “right to payment” under § 11 U.S.C. 105(5)(a)
• explaining a split in authority over whether debtors may modify redemption rights after a tax sale under § 1322(b)(2) and concluding that the “redemption relationship” between the purchaser and the prior owner does not amount to a “claim”
• confirmed plan does not have preclusive effect on a party who did not receive notice sufficient to satisfy its due process rights
• interpreting California law to the same effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Pittman
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-05-06· cited 13×
• In re Gonzalez
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-05-19· cited 11×
• County of Imperial Treasurer-Tax Collector v. Stadtmueller (In Re RW Meridian LLC)
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-02-03· cited 6×
• In re Curley
  E.D. Louisiana· 2017-07-07· cited 3×
• Bryant v. Hamilton County (In re Bryant)
  E.D. Tennessee· 2016-04-05· cited 2×
• In re: Rw Meridian LLC
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-02-03
• In re Lieber
  N.D. Iowa· 2019-04-22
• In re: Erin Ann Sharp
  Ninth Circuit· 2025-01-24
• U.S. Bank National Association v. Darlene Vertullo
  First Circuit· 2020-01-10

Cites

80 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
  Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
• United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
• Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Craft
  Supreme Court· 1978-05-01· cited 1,419×
• United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa
  Supreme Court· 2010-03-23· cited 1,364×
• Johnson v. Home State Bank
  Supreme Court· 1991-06-10· cited 1,263×
• Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. Davenport
  Supreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 854×
• In Re: Russell Schwartz Linda Schwartz, Debtors. Russell Schwartz Linda Schwartz v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-01-22· cited 456×
• Ohio v. Kovacs
  Supreme Court· 1985-01-09· cited 419×
• Alliance Mortgage Co. v. Rothwell
  California Supreme Court· 1995-08-28· cited 407×
• Soares v. Brockton Credit Union
  First Circuit· 1997-03-13· cited 304×
• Johnson v. First National Bank Of Montevideo
  First Circuit· 1983-10-11· cited 260×
• In the Matter of Benny L. ROACH and Edith Roach, Appellants
  Third Circuit· 1987-08-25· cited 228×
• Moeller v. Chun-Yen Lien
  California Court of Appeal· 1994-06-07· cited 168×
• Knapp v. Doherty
  California Court of Appeal· 2004-09-20· cited 143×
• Nguyen v. Calhoun
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-01-15· cited 135×
• Wilshire Courtyard v. California Franchise Tax Board
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-09-10· cited 127×
• In Re: Robert McKnight Pardee Darlene Daigle-Pardee, Debtors. Great Lakes Higher Education Corporation v. Robert McKnight Pardee Darlene Daigle-Pardee
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-10-25· cited 121×
• Trulis v. Barton
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-09-27· cited 117×
• Christensen v. Tucson Estates, Inc. (In re Tucson Estates, Inc.)
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-08-30· cited 116×
• Fjeldsted v. Lien (In Re Fjeldsted)
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-04-30· cited 113×