Nguyen v. Calhoun

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding 1 The foreclosure proceedings in this case predated the effective date of the 2015 amendments to NRS Chapter 116, which created a statutory right of redemption and imposed time limits on pre-sale lien-default cures. See NRS 116.31166(1), (3) (2017
• holding 1 The foreclosure proceedings in this case predated the effective date of the 2015 amendments to NRS Chapter 116, which created a statutory right of redemption and imposed time limits on pre-sale lien-default cures. See NRS 116.31166(1), (3) (2017
• “[a]s a general rule, a trustee’s sale is complete upon acceptance of the highest bid”
• \The trustor-mortgagor or the person who alleges that a debt has been paid has the burden of proving payment.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• \The trustor-mortgagor or the person who alleges that a debt has been paid has the burden of proving payment.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “In this case, then, we conclude that the foreclosure sale may not be set aside based on the lender’s alleged breach of an oral agreement to postpone the trustee’s sale.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).