S.D. New York· 12/13/2010
In Re Refco Securities Litigation
Citations
- 759 F. Supp. 2d 301
- 2010 WL 5129073
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]hen a court decides upon a rule of law, that decision should continue to govern the same issues in subsequent stages in the same case.”
- “[W]here a broker does not have discretionary trading authority over an account, the broker’s only duty is the proper execution of transactions upon explicit customer instructions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jed S. Rakoff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Deangelis v. CorzineS.D. New York· 2014-02-11· cited 35×
- In Re Agape LitigationE.D. New York· 2011-03-29· cited 29×
- BLT Restaurant Group LLC v. TourondelS.D. New York· 2012-02-22· cited 24×
- BNP Paribas Mortgage Corp. v. Bank of America, N.A.S.D. New York· 2012-06-05· cited 13×
- Solomon v. Siemens Industry, Inc.E.D. New York· 2014-03-26· cited 11×
- LG Capital Funding, LLC v. 5Barz Int'l, Inc.E.D. New York· 2018-03-31· cited 8×
- Banco Industrial de Venezuela, C.A. v. CDW Direct, L.L.C.S.D. New York· 2012-08-31· cited 8×
- Hamilton Reserve Bank v. Sri LankaSecond Circuit· 2025-04-10· cited 4×
- Calvert ex rel. Meridian Investors Trust v. Zions Bancorporation (In re Consolidated Meridian Funds)W.D. Washington· 2013-01-03· cited 3×
- Clarke v. CosmoE.D. New York· 2011-03-29· cited 1×
Other cases named In Re Refco Securities Litigation
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.