In re Read

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because debtor was not making retirement contributions at the time she filed her case, retirement contributions started post-petition not excluded from disposable income

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Cantu
  E.D. Virginia· 2016-07-14· cited 12×
• In re Vanlandingham
  D. Kansas· 2014-09-30· cited 9×
• In re Melendez
  D. Colorado· 2019-02-20· cited 8×
• Miner v. Johns
  W.D. Louisiana· 2018-05-23· cited 5×
• John Penfound v. David Ruskin
  Sixth Circuit· 2021-08-10· cited 2×
• In re Camille Davis
  Sixth Circuit· 2020-06-01

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Russello v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1983-11-01· cited 2,703×
• Keene Corp. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1993-05-24· cited 894×
• Baxter, Barnee v. Johnson (In Re Johnson)
  S.D. Georgia· 2006-07-21· cited 60×
• Deborah Seafort v. Beverly Burden
  Sixth Circuit· 2012-02-15· cited 50×
• Burden v. Seafort (In Re Seafort)
  Sixth Circuit· 2010-09-14· cited 33×
• In re: Barron D. Parks and Linda R. Parks
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-08-06· cited 29×
• In Re Prigge
  D. Montana· 2010-03-04· cited 26×
• In Re McCullers
  N.D. California· 2011-06-08· cited 19×
• In Re Egan
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-08-30· cited 13×
• In re Drapeau
  D. Massachusetts· 2013-01-08· cited 12×
• In re Bruce
  W.D. Washington· 2012-12-11· cited 8×