Skip to main content
E.D. Virginia· 7/14/2016

In re Cantu

Citations

  • 553 B.R. 565
  • 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 2585
  • 2016 WL 3982881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adopting Baxter v. Johnson (In re Johnson), 346 B.R. 256 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2006) “for the simple reason that Section 541(b)(7
  • adopting Johnson “for the simple reason that Section 541(b)(7) does not limit the debtor’s ability to make contributions post-petition, nor is there any distinction between pre-petition contributions and post-petition contributions in the statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kenney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.