In re R.C.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5150
Syllabus
The juvenile court did not error or abuse its discretion in: (1) granting permanent custody of the children to the Agency when Father minimally engaged in the case plan, and Mother and Father did not secure housing within a period of a year and (2) when the juvenile court did not conduct an in-camera interview of the children because the GAL indicated that it was in the best interest of the children to grant permanent custody to the Agency.
Judges: Byrne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- In re R.K.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-07· cited 39×
- In re D.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-19· cited 37×
- In re C.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-14· cited 35×
- In re A.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-19· cited 33×
- In re F.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-08· cited 32×
- In re M.G.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-24· cited 29×
- In re R.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-23· cited 27×
- In re K.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-22· cited 26×
- In re D.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-28· cited 25×
- In re A.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-07· cited 22×
- In re M.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-01-10· cited 18×
- In re K.K.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-18· cited 3×
- In re Z.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-14· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.