Skip to main content

In re R.C.

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 5150

Syllabus

The juvenile court did not error or abuse its discretion in: (1) granting permanent custody of the children to the Agency when Father minimally engaged in the case plan, and Mother and Father did not secure housing within a period of a year and (2) when the juvenile court did not conduct an in-camera interview of the children because the GAL indicated that it was in the best interest of the children to grant permanent custody to the Agency.

Judges: Byrne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.