In re Ralston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding there was an absence of any apparent harm to a client or benefit to the lawyer
• imposing Review Panel reprimand for violations of Rules 1.15 and 1.8
• imposing Review Panel reprimand for violations of Rules 1.15 and 1.8
• Review Panel reprimand for using earned but undisbursed fees from trust account to provide no-interest loan to client
• Review Board reprimand appropriate for violation of GRPC Rules 1.8 (e) and 1.15 (II) (b)
• Review Panel reprimand for using earned but undisbursed fees from trust account to provide no-interest loan to client

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the Matter of Edward Shuff Cook
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2021-04-05· cited 31×
• In re Brock
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-07-01· cited 5×
• In the Matter of Hakeem Bertrand Brock
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-07-01· cited 5×
• In the Matter of Willie George Davis, Jr
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2023-03-21· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re Howard
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2013-02-04· cited 17×
• In re Francis
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2015-06-01· cited 12×
• In re Storrs
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2016-10-31· cited 3×
• In re Morse
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2013-09-23· cited 2×