Skip to main content

In re Howard

Citations

  • 292 Ga. 413
  • 738 S.E.2d 89
  • 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 176
  • 2013 WL 425363
  • 2013 Ga. LEXIS 112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “a trust account is a high honor and privilege afforded to a member of the Bar, so even a technical violation should have public discipline so as to protect clients, courts, and the public”
  • imposing public reprimand where attorney admitted violations of trust account rules, but no actual harm was done to clients
  • accepting voluntary petition and imposing public reprimand where attorney admitted violations of trust account rules
  • imposing public reprimand where attorney admitted violations of trust account rules, but no actual harm was done to clients
  • imposing public reprimand for a lawyer for technical violations of Rule 1.15 (II), where no harm was done to clients
  • imposing public reprimand where attorney admitted violations of trust account rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.