In re Q.M.B.
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1975
Syllabus
Neglected child; R.C. 2151.03(A)(2); R.C. 2151.03(A)(3); dependent child; R.C. 2151.04(C); clear and convincing evidence; temporary custody; preponderance of the evidence; body-camera footage; unfairly prejudicial. Where the juvenile court's finding that a child should be adjudicated neglected and dependent was supported by clear and convincing evidence and the court's order of temporary custody of the child to the agency was supported by a preponderance of the evidence, the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it issued the adjudication and dispositions orders. Further, the juvenile court's introduction of body-camera footage at the adjudicatory hearing was not unfairly prejudicial to the Mother.
Judges: Clary
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- In re Z.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-12-27· cited 335×
- State v. MoralesOhio Supreme Court· 1987-09-02· cited 329×
- Oberlin v. Akron Gen. Med. Ctr.Ohio Supreme Court· 2001-03-27· cited 90×
- State v. FrazierOhio Supreme Court· 1995-08-23· cited 71×
- In re RiddleOhio Supreme Court· 1997-07-23· cited 19×
- In re R.L.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-14· cited 18×
- In re K.E.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-22· cited 6×
- In re A.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-28· cited 5×
- In re J.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-19· cited 4×
- Shephard v. CrossCountry Mtge., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-05-29· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.