E.D. Pennsylvania· 9/26/2011

In Re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation

Citations

821 F. Supp. 2d 709
2011 WL 4467685
2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109641

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that “mere repetitive generic reference to ‘Defendants’ tacked on to a conclusory verb form” failed to connect particular defendants to an antitrust conspiracy
dismissing § 1 claim against trade association because it was improper to “impute the activities of [an] organization’s members to the organization itself’
discussing the specific alleged conduct of Defendants generally in furtherance of alleged conspiracy
discussing the specific alleged conduct of Defendants generally in furtherance of alleged conspiracy
noting the suggestion in Twombly “appears in that case in relation to a narrow factual context where a Chicago Tribune article reported on a defendant-speaker’s thoughts on a matter that were only selectively excerpted in the complaint.”
describing the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs ‘core allegations’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gene E.K. Pratter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.