Skip to main content
E.D. Pennsylvania· 7/16/2012

In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation

Citations

  • 284 F.R.D. 249
  • 2012 WL 2885924

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the first Girsh factor supported approval of a settlement because it would prevent prolonged litigation that could reduce any recovery for the class
  • applying presumption of fairness when 1.14% of class opted out, noting that the opt-out rate was “virtually di minimis”
  • finding that publication of notice “in several appropriate publications” was adequate
  • finding that objections from 1.14% of notice recipients was di minimis
  • approving settlement where class members had “127 days from the postmark date that the notice of the settlement was mailed by first-class mail ... to return a completed Claim Form to make a claim for benefits”
  • granting final approval where “no formal discovery was conducted” prior to settlement but counsel conducted informal discovery including their investigation prior to filing the complaint and review of records produced by a co-defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gene, Pratter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.