E.D. Pennsylvania· 7/16/2012
In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation
Citations
- 284 F.R.D. 249
- 2012 WL 2885924
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the first Girsh factor supported approval of a settlement because it would prevent prolonged litigation that could reduce any recovery for the class
- applying presumption of fairness when 1.14% of class opted out, noting that the opt-out rate was “virtually di minimis”
- finding that publication of notice “in several appropriate publications” was adequate
- finding that objections from 1.14% of notice recipients was di minimis
- approving settlement where class members had “127 days from the postmark date that the notice of the settlement was mailed by first-class mail ... to return a completed Claim Form to make a claim for benefits”
- granting final approval where “no formal discovery was conducted” prior to settlement but counsel conducted informal discovery including their investigation prior to filing the complaint and review of records produced by a co-defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gene, Pratter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re National Football League Players Concussion Injury LitigationThird Circuit· 2016-04-18· cited 217×
- In re National Football League Players' Concussion Injury LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-04-22· cited 57×
- In re Domestic Airline Travel Antitrust LitigationD.C. Circuit· 2019-05-13· cited 26×
- Turner v. National Football LeagueE.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-07-07· cited 22×
- In re Certainteed Fiber Cement Siding LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-03-20· cited 11×
- Wallace v. PowellM.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-12-14· cited 7×
- In re Imprelis Herbicide Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-10-17· cited 2×
- In re Amtrak Train Derailment in PhiladelphiaE.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-07-31
- Wallace v. PowellM.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-07-07
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court· 2011-06-20· cited 4,653×
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
- In Re General Motors Corporation Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation. Jack French, Robert M. West, Charles E. Merritt, Gary Blades, Dawn and Tracey Best, Gary and Jackie Barnes, Betty Marteny, John and Mary Southands, Edmund Berning, Dale W. Plummer, Edmund and Anneta Casey, John aThird Circuit· 1995-04-17· cited 850×
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationThird Circuit· 1998-07-23· cited 840×
- Baby Neal v. CaseyThird Circuit· 1994-12-15· cited 562×
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationThird Circuit· 2009-01-16· cited 549×
- In Re: Cendant Corporation LitigationThird Circuit· 1992-02-11· cited 465×
- Eisenberg v. GagnonThird Circuit· 1985-06-28· cited 452×
- Girsh v. JepsonThird Circuit· 1975-07-25· cited 427×
- Sullivan v. DB Investments, Inc.Third Circuit· 2011-12-20· cited 369×
- Robert Stewart v. Lynne AbrahamThird Circuit· 2001-12-26· cited 311×
- In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust LitigationThird Circuit· 2009-09-08· cited 204×
- Hassine v. JeffesThird Circuit· 1988-04-29· cited 196×
- In Re Pet Food Products Liability LitigationThird Circuit· 2010-12-16· cited 154×
- Alan D. Gordon, M.D. Alan D. Gordon, M.D., P.C., a Corporation Mifflin County Community Surgical Center, a Corporation v. Lewistown HospitalThird Circuit· 2005-09-12· cited 145×
- Dewey v. Volkswagen AktiengesellschaftThird Circuit· 2012-05-31· cited 140×
- Ehrheart v. Verizon WirelessThird Circuit· 2010-06-15· cited 125×
- Karcich v. StuartE.D. Pennsylvania· 2000-05-09· cited 104×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.