In re Prince & Walter
Citations
- 131 F. 546
- 14 Pa. D. 172
- 1904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218
Syllabus
<p>1. Bankruptcy — Mortgages—Lien—Extinguishment.</p> <p>Under Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 67d, 30 Stat 564 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3451], providing that liens given or accepted in good faith, etc., which have been recorded according to law, shall not be affected by the act, where real estate of a bankrupt was ordered to be sold subject to a first mortgage, and the trustee, who was the holder of a second mortgage thereon, obtained special leave to bid as a lien creditor, and the referee’s original order of sale expressly provided that the land should be sold subject only to the first mortgage, the lien of the second mortgage was divested by the sale.</p> <p>2. Same — Taxes—State Statutes — Construction.</p> <p>Act Pa. June 4, 1901, § 2 (P. L. 364), providing that all taxes that may thereafter be lawfully imposed or assessed on any property shall be a first lien thereon, etc., and that such lien shall have priority to, and be fully paid and satisfied out of the proceeds of, any judicial sales of the property, etc., is prospective only, and does not give priority to taxes over a mortgage which was a lien before its passage.</p> <p>3. Same — Order of Sale — Liens—Vacation.</p> <p>Where real estate of a bankrupt was sold subject only to a first mortgage thereon, such sale operated to divest a tax lien on the property, as against a purchaser on the faith of the record, notwithstanding Act Pa. June 4, 1901, § 32 (P. L. 375). by which all taxes are made a continuing lien on property, notwithstanding a judicial sale, unless the proceeds of the sale are sufficient to pay them.</p> <p>4. Same — Assets—Payment of Claims — Priority—Taxes.</p> <p>Under Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 64, 30 Stat. 563 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3448], providing the order of priority in which debts or charges against the estate of a bankrupt are to be paid, and declaring that the court shall order the trustee to pay all taxes legally due and owing by the bankrupt in advance of the payme
Judges: Archbald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Van Huffel v. HarkelrodeSupreme Court· 1931-12-07· cited 136×
- Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n v. HarrisonNinth Circuit· 1907-11-04· cited 49×
- Adair v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nSupreme Court· 1938-02-28· cited 47×
- Freedman Bros. v. ParkerNinth Circuit· 1911-02-06· cited 36×
- Crocker v. ChakosSeventh Circuit· 1928-03-06· cited 33×
- In re AndersonSecond Circuit· 1922-01-18· cited 32×
- Appleton v. Gagnon (In Re Gagnon)M.D. Pennsylvania· 1983-01-27· cited 19×
- Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. Roberts CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1914-10-29· cited 17×
- City of Chattanooga v. HillSixth Circuit· 1905-07-21· cited 16×
- In re HowardN.D. New York· 1913-08-08· cited 15×
- Stanard v. DaytonEighth Circuit· 1915-01-04· cited 15×
- Town of Emery v. AlmWisconsin Supreme Court· 1925-03-10· cited 12×
- In re Andrews & SimondsW.D. Michigan· 1911-12-15· cited 11×
- In re Wyoming Valley Ice Co.M.D. Pennsylvania· 1906-04-11· cited 10×
- Jennings v. William A. Stannus & SonNinth Circuit· 1911-11-06· cited 7×
- Dixon v. KoplarEighth Circuit· 1939-03-15· cited 6×
- In re Von KermE.D. Pennsylvania· 1905-03-13· cited 6×
- In re Halsey Electric Generator Co.D. New Jersey· 1909-12-30· cited 6×
- In re HosmerS.D. Iowa· 1916-05-26· cited 6×
- In re BrezinD. New Jersey· 1924-01-25· cited 6×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stewart v. PlattSupreme Court· 1879-12-22· cited 123×
- City of Waco v. BryanFifth Circuit· 1904-01-26· cited 15×
- Appeal of the City of TitusvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1885-02-16· cited 13×
- In re DuffyM.D. Pennsylvania· 1902-12-06· cited 12×
- Hammer v. FreeseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1852-09-28· cited 11×
- In re VeitchD. Connecticut· 1900-04-11· cited 11×
- Swarts v. HammerEighth Circuit· 1903-02-02· cited 11×
- In re KeetM.D. Pennsylvania· 1903-12-23· cited 10×
- In re TeboD. West Virginia· 1900-04-30· cited 8×
- In re Le VayM.D. Pennsylvania· 1903-11-27· cited 8×
- In re GrimesW.D. North Carolina· 1899-08-25· cited 8×
- Bonsall v. ComlySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1863-03-26· cited 7×
- In re ConhaimD. Washington· 1900-03-08· cited 6×
- In re KellerN.D. Iowa· 1901-06-05· cited 5×
- In re HarveyE.D. Pennsylvania· 1903-05-29· cited 2×
- In re SimsS.D. Georgia· 1902-10-21· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.