In re Howard
Citations
- 207 F. 402
- 1913 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1317
Syllabus
<p>1. Interest (§ 43*)—Stipulations—Construction.</p> <p>Tke condition of a bond secured by a mortgage provided for the payment of $1,200 without mentioning interest, of which $15 was to be due on the first day of each month, and further provided that such payment of $15 was to be for interest and principal; that at the end of each year the mortgagor was to be credited for the sums actually paid, interest and principal; that should any default be made in the payment of interest, etc., the principal sum should become due. The mortgage provided that for better securing the payment of the sum mentioned in th'e condition of the bond, “with interest thereon,” the premises described were thereby granted, and further provided that, if the mortgagor should pay the sum mentioned in the condition of the bond “and the interest thereon,” the mortgage and the estate granted should cease, determine, and be void. Held, that the whole principal sum bore interest from the date of the instruments which the obligors promised to pay from month to month, with the monthly payments of principal; the bond and mortgage not being open to the construction contended for that interest was to be allowed on each installment for one month only, and to.be deducted from the $15 before applying the balance on the principal, since interest was plainly and repeatedly provided for and was in no way limited to interest on the installments, especially where, at the time of an assignment of the bond and mortgage, the mortgagor indorsed on the bond a stipulation as to the amount due, showing that he .construed the bond as providing for interest on the whole principal sum.</p> <p>[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Interest, Cent. Dig. § 92; Dec. Dig. § 43.*]</p> <p>2. Interest (§ 1*)—Grounds for Allowance.</p> <p>Interest can be allowed only by virtue of some contract, express or implied, or by virtue of some statute, or on account of the default of the party liable to pay, when it is allowed as damages for the
Judges: Ray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Crocker v. ChakosSeventh Circuit· 1928-03-06· cited 33×
- In re North Star Ice & Coal Co.E.D. Tennessee· 1918-05-13· cited 27×
- In Re Independent Distillers of KentuckyW.D. Kentucky· 1940-09-11· cited 10×
- Bird v. City of RichmondFourth Circuit· 1917-03-14· cited 10×
- Dugan v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1929-03-08· cited 7×
- Wire Wheel Corp. of America v. Fayette Bank & Trust Co. of ConnersvilleSeventh Circuit· 1928-12-12· cited 6×
- Washburn v. DouthitEighth Circuit· 1934-10-08· cited 6×
- In re SimpsonD. Idaho· 1929-02-27· cited 5×
- In re BowenE.D. Pennsylvania· 1942-09-03· cited 5×
- In re DawkinsE.D. South Carolina· 1929-09-07· cited 4×
- Cherry v. Insull Utility Investments, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1932-05-28· cited 3×
- In re Ford's Wawbeek Springs, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1925-06-15· cited 3×
- Merkel, Inc. v. RasquinE.D. New York· 1935-09-05
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Teal v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1884-04-07· cited 141×
- Morley v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1892-11-14· cited 126×
- Redfield v. Ystalyfera Iron Co.Supreme Court· 1884-01-21· cited 93×
- Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n v. HarrisonNinth Circuit· 1907-11-04· cited 49×
- Smith v. Township of Au GresSixth Circuit· 1906-11-07· cited 46×
- Redfield v. BartelsSupreme Court· 1891-04-20· cited 45×
- In re TorchiaThird Circuit· 1911-06-20· cited 40×
- In re Prince & WalterM.D. Pennsylvania· 1904-07-28· cited 33×
- In re CramondN.D. New York· 1906-06-06· cited 30×
- Ridgely Nat. Bank v. MathenySeventh Circuit· 1901-01-02· cited 25×
- In re TorchiaW.D. Pennsylvania· 1911-02-01· cited 25×
- In re ZehnerE.D. Louisiana· 1912-02-27· cited 24×
- In re Erie Lumber Co.S.D. Georgia· 1906-09-26· cited 21×
- In re Vulcan Foundry & Machine Co.Third Circuit· 1910-06-18· cited 19×
- In re Sanford Furniture Mfg. Co.E.D. North Carolina· 1903-12-30· cited 12×
- In re TeboD. West Virginia· 1900-04-30· cited 8×
- In re Bourlier Cornice & Roofing Co.W.D. Kentucky· 1905-01-03· cited 4×
- In re MeadowsW.D. New York· 1912-10-03· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.