Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 5/10/2013
In re Powers
Citations
- 465 Mass. 63
- 987 N.E.2d 569
- 2013 WL 1909510
- 2013 Mass. LEXIS 328
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that respondent was not prejudiced because of denied request to appear before regulatory body where he \provided no proffer of what he or his attorney would have said to the [body] had his request for an appearance been honored\
- “the Legislature, by statute [G. L. c. 211, § 4], has given this court the exclusive authority to remove clerks of court”
- where clerk-magistrate had constitutionally protected interest in his position, due process was satisfied when he received full and fair hearing before any meaningful deprivation occurred
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gants
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Caesars Massachusetts Management Co. v. CrosbyFirst Circuit· 2015-02-13· cited 23×
- Commonwealth v. Orbin O., a juvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2018-02-05· cited 10×
- Campatelli v. Chief Justice of Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2014-06-20· cited 10×
- Perullo v. Advisory Committee on Personnel StandardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2017-04-24· cited 4×
- Doe, SORB No. 209081 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2017-12-06
- White v. Chief Justice of the Boston Municipal CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2019-07-12
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 6,903×
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,926×
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court· 1965-04-27· cited 2,943×
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court· 1975-04-16· cited 2,322×
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court· 1914-06-08· cited 732×
- Commonwealth v. Clerk-Magistrate of the West Roxbury Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2003-05-08· cited 42×
- State Board of Retirement v. BulgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-03-06· cited 33×
- First Justice of the Bristol Division of the Juvenile Court Department v. Clerk-magistrate of the Bristol Division of the Juvenile Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2003-01-07· cited 30×
- Bradford v. KnightsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-07-07· cited 27×
- Hoffer v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2012-02-03· cited 27×
- Travis v. McDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-04-07· cited 26×
- Martorano v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-12-14· cited 25×
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1938-07-01· cited 25×
- Liability Investigative Fund Effort, Inc. v. Massachusetts Medical Professional InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1994-07-21· cited 23×
- Harris v. Board of Trustees of State CollegesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-08-08· cited 20×
- Rivas v. Chelsea Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2013-02-08· cited 20×
- MASSACHUSETTS BAR ASSOCIATION v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1966-10-14· cited 18×
- Attorney General v. FlynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1954-05-28· cited 14×
- District Attorney for the Norfolk District v. Quincy Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-05-10· cited 13×
- In the Matter of DuganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1993-12-02· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.