Skip to main content
N.D. Ohio· 2/9/2015

In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation

Citations

  • 152 F. Supp. 3d 968
  • 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15404
  • 2015 WL 520930

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • regarding affirmative concealment that must be shown to toll a limitations period
  • defendants’ proffered reasons for a price increase were “affirmative acts of concealment,” despite their accuracy, because “a portion of the announced price increase” was due to undisclosed “collusion with competitors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zouhary

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

75 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.