Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/1/2021

In re P.L.H.

Citations

2021 Ohio 3522

Syllabus

The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion by awarding legal custody of a child to her grandmother rather than to appellant, who is the child's father. The evidence supported the court's decision that returning the child to appellant would be detrimental to the child. The court therefore did not act arbitrarily, unreasonably, or unconscionably. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

In re T.G.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-06· cited 2×
[J.S.] v. [K.V.]
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-18

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Blakemore v. Blakemore
Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
State v. Dehass
Ohio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
Perales v. Nino
Ohio Supreme Court· 1977-11-30· cited 446×
Buckeye Retirement Co., L.L.C., Ltd. v. Busch
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-26· cited 13×
In re R.R.S.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-16· cited 5×
In re I.R.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-24· cited 4×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.