Skip to main content
S.D. Indiana· 2/4/2015

In re Peterson

Citations

  • 524 B.R. 808
  • 2015 Bankr. LEXIS 351
  • 2015 WL 509805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that intentional tort judgment based on improperly accessing medical information was not a consumer debt because it was not voluntarily incurred and was not the type of debt the debtor “would ordinarily expect to incur in her daily affairs”
  • stating that intentional tort claims, such as judgments arising from automobile accidents, are interstitial debts, not consumer debts
  • finding an intentional tort judgment was not consumer debt because it arose involuntarily
  • inability to classify a particular debt as a business debt does not automatically relegate it to the status of a consumer debt
  • an intentional tort judgment is an interstitial debt, not a consumer debt or a business debt
  • an intentional tort judgment is an interstitial debt, not a consumer debt or a business debt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moberly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.