Skip to main content
S.D. Texas· 7/2/1999

In Re Perry

Citations

  • 235 B.R. 603
  • 42 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 585
  • 13 Tex.Bankr.Ct.Rep. 357
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10540
  • 1999 WL 477259

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Debtor’s argument does not comport with the Supreme Court’s focus on the rights of a creditor.”
  • by using phrase “security interest” in anti-modification clause instead of term of art “secured claim,” Congress indicated that it “did not intend to predicate the protection of a creditor’s rights upon the value of the underlying collateral.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hittner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.