Tanner v. FirstPlus Financial Inc. (In Re Tanner)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that valuations are “arbitrary and unscientific” and so should not be emphasized
• denying strip off but acknowledging that the result is that “a creditor will have greater rights in bankruptcy than those bargained for under state law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).