In re P.B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When the legislature has clearly delineated the class that can petition to enforce a statutory scheme, we will implement that determination meticulously.” (quotation omitted)
• “Here, because [the child’s] parents did not restrict the [grandparents’] ability to visit [the child] ‘prior to or contemporaneous with’ their deaths, their deaths conferred standing upon [the grandparents] to file for grandparent visitation.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Petition of Pamela Lundquist and Robert Lundquist
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2016-03-08· cited 2×
• Atronix, Inc. v. Kenneth Morris & a.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2018-10-23
• In the Matter of Brianna Kauble and William Kauble
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2023-09-19

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Troxel v. Granville
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
• State v. Lambert
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-12-17· cited 325×
• Roberts v. Ward
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-04-18· cited 37×
• In Re Rupa
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-12-22· cited 14×
• In re Bordalo
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2012-10-30· cited 10×
• O'Brien v. O'Brien
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-11-18· cited 9×
• In Re Athena D.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2011-06-30· cited 7×
• In Re Dufton
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-06-03· cited 5×