In re Patt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• conversion of a client's funds is an act involving moral turpitude
• conversion of a client’s funds is an act involving moral turpitude
• conversion of a client’s funds is an act involving moral turpitude

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Committee on Legal Ethics v. Six
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1989-04-21· cited 43×
• In Re Grant
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1982-02-19· cited 30×
• In Re Vavrik
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1987-05-22· cited 4×
• State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Veith
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-05-31· cited 2×
• STATE EX REL. STATE BAR v. Veith
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-05-31· cited 1×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Phillips
  California Supreme Court· 1941-01-17· cited 100×
• In Re Andros
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-10-01· cited 57×
• In Re Wigoda
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1979-10-02· cited 55×
• In Re Stillo
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-10-05· cited 40×
• In Re Eaton
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1958-09-18· cited 38×
• In Re O'Hallaren
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-10-01· cited 30×
• In Re Crane
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1961-11-30· cited 29×
• The People Ex Rel. Ryan v. Sempek
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1958-01-24· cited 22×
• In Re Browning
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1962-01-22· cited 20×
• 8930 South Harlem, Ltd. v. Moore
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1979-10-19· cited 18×
• In Re Royal
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1963-11-26· cited 17×
• In Re Greenberg
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1961-01-20· cited 15×
• In Re Cook
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-06-01· cited 12×
• In Re Ahern
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1962-09-28· cited 7×