In Re Wigoda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a continuing belief in one’s innocence is not sufficient to bar reinstatement and noting the distinction between repentance and reha-bilitation
• city alderman convicted of accepting bribe may be reinstated despite his continuing assertion of innocence
• city alderman convicted of accepting bribe may be reinstated despite his continuing assertion of innocence
• “Rehabilitation, the most important consideration in reinstatement proceedings, is a matter of one’s return to a beneficial, constructive and trustworthy role.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).