Skip to main content

In re O.V.

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 4628

Syllabus

The juvenile court did not have subject-matter jurisdiction to adjudicate appellant a delinquent child for committing acts that if charged as an adult would constitute gross sexual imposition where all sexual contact between appellant and the victim took place in New York, not Ohio, since a child may be adjudicated a delinquent child in Ohio only if the child is found to have violated a law of this state, the United States, or an ordinance of a political subdivision of this state.

Judges: S. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.