In re O.M.
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 5433
Syllabus
Serious youthful offender blended sentence juvenile court invocation of adult sentence R.C. 2152.14 likelihood of rehabilitation clear and convincing evidence public policy juveniles less culpable. There was not clear and convincing evidence in the record that juvenile was unlikely to be rehabilitated during the remainder of his juvenile delinquency commitment. Therefore, the invocation of his adult prison sentence was premature and is reversed.
Judges: Blackmon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 2012-06-25· cited 6,816×
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court· 2005-03-01· cited 3,523×
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court· 2010-05-17· cited 3,477×
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-03-22· cited 2,202×
- Johnson v. TexasSupreme Court· 1993-08-09· cited 750×
- In re C.S.Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-09-27· cited 170×
- In re C.P.Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-04-03· cited 141×
- In re AglerOhio Supreme Court· 1969-07-09· cited 108×
- State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. SoloveOhio Supreme Court· 1990-06-13· cited 102×
- In re J.V.Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-10-30· cited 88×
- State v. D.H.Ohio Supreme Court· 2009-01-08· cited 68×
- Ex parte JanuszewskiU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio· 1911-12-04· cited 49×
- State v. Carnes (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-08-15· cited 40×
- United States v. Reco Vondell JohnsonD.C. Circuit· 1994-07-08· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.