In re N.R.

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 2896

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting legal custody of the child to Father. The court reviewed the applicable statutory factors and found that custody to Father was in the child's best interest. The trial court's denial of children services' motion for permanent custody was not against the manifest weight of the evidence and was supported by sufficient evidence, as the agency failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that permanent custody with the agency was in the child's best interest. Judgment affirmed.