In Re Norris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In my view, a bankruptcy judge in a pending proceeding simply does not have the power to determine that the automatic stay shall not be available in subsequent bankruptcy proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tsafaroff v. Taylor (In re Taylor)
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-09-05· cited 65×
• Frascatore v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development (In Re Frascatore)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-04-13· cited 40×
• Taras v. Commonwealth Mortgage Corp. of America (In Re Taras)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1992-02-12· cited 39×
• In Re Siciliano
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-05-05· cited 22×
• Little v. Taylor (In Re Taylor)
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-08-07· cited 21×
• In Re Giordano
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1999-06-08· cited 11×
• In Re Feldman
  E.D. New York· 2004-04-06· cited 11×
• In Re Surace
  C.D. California· 1985-09-17· cited 10×
• Kessler v. Homestead Savings (In Re Kessler)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-05-11· cited 8×
• Matter of Nichols
  S.D. Ohio· 1991-11-27· cited 4×
• Brengettcy v. National Mortgage Co. (In Re Brengettcy)
  W.D. Tennessee· 1995-01-10· cited 4×
• In Re Fallon
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2000-02-14· cited 4×
• In Re Vita
  S.D. New York· 1988-02-02· cited 3×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-09-05· cited 2×
• Friend v. Chemical Residential Mortgage Corp. (In Re Friend)
  W.D. Tennessee· 1996-01-24· cited 1×
• Metmor Financial, Inc. v. Debtors & Trustee (In re Cruz Martinez)
  D. Puerto Rico· 1991-01-24· cited 1×
• In re: Vincent Cusano v.
  Sixth Circuit· 2010-06-25