· 2/12/1992
Taras v. Commonwealth Mortgage Corp. of America (In Re Taras)
Citations
- 136 B.R. 941
- 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 175
- 1992 WL 25044
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- this court remains bound by Third Circuit precedent in the absence of subsequent contrary Supreme Court authority directly on point
- bankruptcy court must follow the law as set forth by the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit until the Supreme Court directs to the contrary
- taken together, verify that lower courts must be cautious in interpreting Supreme Court decisions in a manner which will overrule earlier controlling Court of Appeals precedent
- ‘‘Principles of stare decisis command this court to follow the law of the circuit, as set forth by the [Court of Appeals], unless and until the Supreme Court [of the United States] directs to the contrary.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: David A. Scholl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.