In Re Nelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[m]ost courts faced with a request for a hardship discharge have required the presence of catastrophic circumstances”
• stating that a debtor must “persuade the court that each of [the] three subsections have been complied with before the court will consider whether the debtor is entitled to [a] hardship discharge”
• finding that the debtor’s loss of vehicle and inability to acquire full-time employment coupled with a sizeable unexpected expense in the amount of $1,118 all constituted economic events insufficient to warrant a hardship discharge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Guentert
  W.D. Missouri· 1997-05-19· cited 22×
• In Re Cummins
  N.D. Iowa· 2001-09-05· cited 5×
• In re Shorter
  E.D. Arkansas· 2015-10-23· cited 5×
• In re Fennig
  N.D. Ohio· 1994-10-28· cited 3×
• In Re Linden
  C.D. Illinois· 1994-11-10

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re White
  N.D. Illinois· 1991-04-16· cited 20×
• Pankau v. First State Bank of Harvard (In Re Pankau)
  N.D. Illinois· 1986-09-22· cited 19×
• In Re Bond
  E.D. North Carolina· 1984-01-06· cited 13×
• In Re Dark
  N.D. Ohio· 1988-07-01· cited 13×
• In Re Graham
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1986-07-24· cited 8×
• In Re Schleppi
  S.D. Ohio· 1989-09-19· cited 8×
• In Re McNealy
  S.D. Ohio· 1983-07-29· cited 8×