In Re Schleppi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “unsubstantiated and conclusory statements” are generally insufficient for a debtor to meet its burden of persuasion
• stating that the debtor’s failure to meet the third prong of Section 1328(b) was alone “fatal” to the motion
• stating that “[c]ourts confronted with a request for a hardship discharge typically have limited its application to catastrophic circumstances”
• finding that the debtor’s failure to satisfy Section 1328(b)(3) was “standing alone, fatal to the motion”
• noting that “hardship discharge” requires “catastrophic circumstances” under § 1328(b)
• “The best interests test under section 1328(b)(2) is essentially the same as that required for the confirmation of a plan under section 1325(d)(4), except that their temporal perspectives differ.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).