In re Nadel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining whether the federal offense of transmission of child pornography had the same essential elements as New York offense of promotion of child pornography
• determining whether the federal offense of transmission of child pornography had the same essential elements as New York offense of promotion of child pornography

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Wroten
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-11-09· cited 52×
• People v. Liden
  New York Court of Appeals· 2012-05-03· cited 25×
• In re R.B.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-04-15· cited 14×
• State v. Hamilton
  Montana Supreme Court· 2007-07-11· cited 11×
• In re Millan
  New York Supreme Court· 2001-05-31· cited 8×
• People v. McGarghan
  New York Supreme Court· 2007-09-05· cited 6×
• North v. Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-09-29· cited 1×
• In Re RB
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-04-15
• In re Parker
  New York Supreme Court· 2005-10-26

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Doe v. Pataki
  S.D. New York· 1998-05-07· cited 192×
• People v. Hernandez
  New York Court of Appeals· 1999-05-06· cited 169×
• People v. Gonzalez
  New York Court of Appeals· 1984-05-08· cited 160×
• People v. Muniz
  New York Court of Appeals· 1989-11-21· cited 137×
• People v. David W.
  New York Court of Appeals· 2000-06-15· cited 135×
• People v. Kearns
  New York Court of Appeals· 2000-06-15· cited 14×
• In re Mandel
  New York County Courts· 2000-06-29· cited 7×