In re Mandel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining whether the federal offense of possession of child pornography had the same essential elements as New York offense of possession of child pornography
• determining whether the federal offense of possession of child pornography had the same essential elements as New York offense of possession of child pornography

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Wroten
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-11-09· cited 52×
• In re R.B.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-04-15· cited 14×
• In re Nadel
  New York Supreme Court· 2001-02-22· cited 12×
• State v. Hamilton
  Montana Supreme Court· 2007-07-11· cited 11×
• In Re RB
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-04-15

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Doe v. Pataki
  S.D. New York· 1998-05-07· cited 192×
• People v. Gonzalez
  New York Court of Appeals· 1984-05-08· cited 160×
• People v. Grate
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-08-11· cited 23×
• People v. Love
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-05-28· cited 10×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1987-04-28· cited 7×