Skip to main content

In re Nadel

Citations

  • 82 A.3d 716
  • 2013 WL 6252499
  • 2013 Del. LEXIS 606

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Our role is to review the record independently and determine whether there is substantial evidence to support the Panel's factual findings.\
  • failure to determine any limits on pre-litigation assistance non-Delaware lawyer thought he could provide when \he had every opportunity to learn this information\ supported a finding of a knowing violation
  • finding a knowing violation of Rule 3.4(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berger, Holland, Ridgely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.