In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware: Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was clear and convincing evidence that attorney violated Rule 3.4(c) by assisting suspended attorney in his practice of law in violation of the order suspending the attorney
• knowing violation of Rule 3.4(c) for assisting Delaware accountant in violating prior cease and desist order
• finding a violation of Rule 8.4(d) by attorney who violated a Supreme Court Order and assisting another lawyer who was suspended to engage in the unauthorized practice of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).