Skip to main content
· 4/2/1985

In Re MV Securities, Inc.

Citations

  • 48 B.R. 156
  • 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 6405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that claim resulting from broker-dealer fraud not entitled to SIPA protection even though funds originally were deposited for the purchase of securities
  • explaining that the definition of “customer” under SIPA is to be construed narrowly
  • SIPA does not protect customer claims based on fraud or breach of contract
  • “SIPA does not protect customer claims based on fraud or breach of contract.”
  • no SIPA protection for claims based on breach of contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prudence B. Abram

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.