Skip to main content
S.D. Ohio· 9/13/2006

In Re Murray

Citations

  • 350 B.R. 408
  • 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2187
  • 2006 WL 2594838

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “There is no ambiguity in the relevant text of this provision [§ 362(c)(4) ] and the plain meaning reading does not produce a result demonstrably at odds with the expressed intent of Congress.”
  • “To summarize, the court holds that § 362(c)(3)(A) terminates the stay with respect to actions taken against the debtor and against property of the debtor, but does not terminate the stay with respect to property of the estate.”
  • “It must be recognized that the plain meaning of the text ‘the stay under subsection (a) shall not go into effect upon the filing of the later case’ results in a determination that the automatic stay is not in effect in this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas F. Waldron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.