S.D. Ohio· 9/13/2006
In Re Murray
Citations
- 350 B.R. 408
- 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2187
- 2006 WL 2594838
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “There is no ambiguity in the relevant text of this provision [§ 362(c)(4) ] and the plain meaning reading does not produce a result demonstrably at odds with the expressed intent of Congress.”
- “To summarize, the court holds that § 362(c)(3)(A) terminates the stay with respect to actions taken against the debtor and against property of the debtor, but does not terminate the stay with respect to property of the estate.”
- “It must be recognized that the plain meaning of the text ‘the stay under subsection (a) shall not go into effect upon the filing of the later case’ results in a determination that the automatic stay is not in effect in this case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas F. Waldron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re SorrellS.D. Ohio· 2007-01-26· cited 54×
- Reswick v. Reswick (In Re Reswick)Ninth Circuit· 2011-02-04· cited 50×
- In Re JumppFirst Circuit· 2006-12-28· cited 33×
- Rinard v. Positive Investments, Inc. (In Re Rinard)C.D. California· 2011-05-09· cited 24×
- In Re CurryN.D. Illinois· 2007-02-22· cited 23×
- Nelson v. George Wong Pension Trust (In Re Nelson)Ninth Circuit· 2008-06-26· cited 21×
- Witkowski v. Knight (Witkowski)First Circuit· 2014-11-13· cited 18×
- In Re DowdenS.D. Ohio· 2010-03-26· cited 11×
- In re RoachM.D. Alabama· 2016-08-25· cited 11×
- Harker v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA (In Re Krause)S.D. Ohio· 2009-09-02· cited 9×
- In Re McFeeleyD. Vermont· 2007-02-22· cited 8×
- Banco Cooperativo de P.R. v. Herrera (In re Herrera)First Circuit· 2018-10-03· cited 7×
- Jumpp v. Chase Home Finance, LLCFirst Circuit· 2006-12-28· cited 6×
- In Re StanfordE.D. Arkansas· 2007-08-03· cited 5×
- In Re HollingsworthD. Utah· 2006-12-21· cited 4×
- Fort v. State of Florida Department of RevenueW.D. Virginia· 2009-06-30· cited 4×
- Bates v. BAC Home Loans (In Re Bates)Eighth Circuit· 2011-03-23· cited 2×
- Wanda Bates v. BAC Home LoansEighth Circuit· 2011-03-23
- Travelers Bank & Trust, FSB v. HayfordSuperior Court of Delaware· 2007-03-15
- United States v. Robinson (In re Robinson)W.D. Tennessee· 2012-11-21
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 3,104×
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1986-11-12· cited 1,318×
- Ankenbrandt Ex Rel. L. R. v. RichardsSupreme Court· 1992-06-15· cited 1,297×
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court· 1994-05-23· cited 1,012×
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court· 1992-04-21· cited 949×
- Cohen v. De La CruzSupreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 919×
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-05-24· cited 894×
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 854×
- Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court· 2006-05-01· cited 695×
- Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1939-01-03· cited 521×
- Central Virginia Community College v. KatzSupreme Court· 2006-01-23· cited 424×
- Rousey v. JacowaySupreme Court· 2005-04-04· cited 197×
- In Re John Paul White, Debtor, John Paul White v. Patricia Ann WhiteSixth Circuit· 1988-07-11· cited 98×
- In Re William Neil Simon, Debtor. Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, Limited v. William Neil SimonNinth Circuit· 1998-08-27· cited 98×
- Patrick E. Catalano v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueNinth Circuit· 2002-01-28· cited 89×
- Andrew Bartlik v. United States Department of Labor and Tennessee Valley AuthoritySixth Circuit· 1995-08-11· cited 87×
- Anaheim Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Evans (In Re Evans)Ninth Circuit· 1983-05-06· cited 85×
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Lewis (In Re Lewis)D. Idaho· 1981-01-05· cited 63×
- In Re Victoria Johnston Laurain, Debtor. David G. Rogers, Trustee v. Victoria Johnston LaurainSixth Circuit· 1997-05-15· cited 57×
- In Re: National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc., Debtor. Amedisys, Inc. v. National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2005-09-13· cited 46×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.