D. New Mexico· 11/30/2016
In re Murphey
Citations
- 563 B.R. 373
- 76 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1351
- 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 4107
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Under New Mexico law, a judgment for foreclosure is final with respect to the rights of the parties in the property, and interlocutory with respect to the manner and terms of the foreclosure sale.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jacobvitz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 2008-06-23· cited 726×
- The Wilderness Soc. v. Kane County, UtahTenth Circuit· 2011-01-11· cited 146×
- Miller v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Tenth Circuit· 2012-02-01· cited 108×
- Pursifull v. EakinTenth Circuit· 1987-03-27· cited 71×
- Grygorwicz v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-02-24· cited 67×
- Coe v. United States District Court for District of ColoradoTenth Circuit· 1982-04-21· cited 43×
- Speckner v. RieboldNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1974-04-05· cited 38×
- In Re GagliardiD. Colorado· 2003-03-18· cited 31×
- U.S. Bank v. Roberts (In Re Roberts)D. Colorado· 2007-04-23· cited 9×
- In re SpencerW.D. Wisconsin· 2015-05-15· cited 9×
- Thomas v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n (In Re Thomas)Tenth Circuit· 2012-05-07· cited 7×
- Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2016-03-03· cited 3×
- Mid-Continent Electric, Inc. v. Fifth Third Bank (In re Mid-Continent Electric, Inc.)M.D. Florida· 2002-04-26· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.