Skip to main content
· 4/23/2007

U.S. Bank v. Roberts (In Re Roberts)

Citations

  • 367 B.R. 677
  • 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 1637
  • 2007 WL 1430339

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that stay relief was appropriate under either § 362(d)(1) or (2) with respect to debtor whose ownership interest in the property was terminated pre-petition but who remained in possession of the property
  • “Under the Reliance Equities standard, there may be circumstances where a motion for relief from stay could constitute an informal proof of claim, but those circumstances would be rare indeed.”
  • “‘a hearing on a motion for relief from stay is merely a summary proceeding of limited effect . . . [and] is not a proceeding for determining the merits of the underlying substantive claims, defenses, or counterclaims’”
  • no finding of informal proof of claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard R. Tallman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.