Skip to main content

In re M.R.

Citations

  • 452 N.E.2d 1085
  • 1983 Ind. App. LEXIS 3316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that CHINS finding was not an appealable final order because only after dispositional decree were the rights of the parties finally determined
  • “Having concluded that Mother’s actions were detrimental to her children’s well-being, the trial court was entitled to believe that such conduct would continue in the absence of court intervention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buchanan, Shields, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.