In re M.R.
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 3648
Syllabus
CHILDREN – CUSTODY – DEPENDENCY – BEST INTEREST: The juvenile court's determination that four of mother's children were dependent under R.C. 2151.04(C) was not supported by clear and convincing evidence as the evidence demonstrated that the children's environment was not such to warrant the state, in the interests of the children, in assuming the children's guardianship. The juvenile court's determination that another child was dependent was supported by clear and convincing evidence, as the evidence demonstrated that the agency proved the child is at risk in an environment in which Mother is directing her care. The juvenile court's determination that granting temporary custody to the Hamilton County Department of Job and Family Services was in the best interest of the dependent child was supported by clear and convincing evidence, as the record demonstrated that the agency can address the child's specific behavioral and medical needs in a specialized residential treatment facility.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a court could not “presume harm” in the absence of “evidence of some nexus between [the mother’s] action and resulting harm to the children” where the mother had been “charged with -48- Case Nos. 5-22-08, 5-22-09 domestic violence and had violated a TPO * * *.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zayass
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- In re Adoption of HolcombOhio Supreme Court· 1985-08-07· cited 1,100×
- Perales v. NinoOhio Supreme Court· 1977-11-30· cited 446×
- In re Baby Girl BaxterOhio Supreme Court· 1985-06-12· cited 243×
- In re C.R.Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-03-29· cited 198×
- In re BurrellOhio Supreme Court· 1979-04-25· cited 94×
- In re D.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-23· cited 12×
- In re A.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-21· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.