Ninth Circuit· 10/9/2007

In Re Morgan

Citations

506 F.3d 705
2007 WL 2916295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that district court error was not “clear error” because “no prior Ninth Circuit authority prohibited the course taken by the district court”
holding that we review for abuse of discretion a court’s rejection of a plea agreement
holding that courts must provide individualized reasons for rejecting a sentencing agreement based on the specific facts and circumstances presented
holding that courts \must consider individually every sentence bargain presented to them\
explaining that “Rule 11 vests district courts with considerable discretion to assess the wisdom of plea bargains”
explaining that “when a court establishes a broad policy based on events unrelated to the . . . case before it, no discretion has been exercised”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alfred T. Goodwin, Sidney R. Thomas, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In Re Morgan

81 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.