E.D. North Carolina· 9/30/2002
In Re Moore
Citations
- 283 B.R. 852
- 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 1162
- 2002 WL 31317449
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the franchisor and franchisee are engaged in a joint enterprise, and because fees are split with WTP-USA, WTP-USA is a BPP
- “The petition has everything to do with the administration of a bankruptcy estate[,] ... is essential to the proper operation of the bankruptcy process, and all parties suffer if a petition is improperly prepared.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: A. Thomas Small
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Kevin J. Doser in Re Laura E. Doser, Judith M. Scott v. United States TrusteeNinth Circuit· 2005-06-17· cited 25×
- In Re Bankruptcy Petition PreparersNinth Circuit· 2004-02-23· cited 23×
- In Re RoseE.D. Tennessee· 2004-08-18· cited 19×
- McDow v. We the People Forms & Service Centers, Inc. (In Re Douglas)D. Maryland· 2003-09-23· cited 15×
- In Re SpringsM.D. North Carolina· 2006-12-07· cited 14×
- Martini v. We the People Forms & Service Centers USA, Inc. (In Re Barcelo)E.D. New York· 2004-08-05· cited 14×
- United States Trustee v. Burton (In re Rosario)D. Massachusetts· 2013-05-29· cited 12×
- In Re EvansE.D. Virginia· 2009-08-23· cited 9×
- Gould v. ClippardM.D. Tennessee· 2006-03-28· cited 8×
- In Re LeonC.D. California· 2004-10-21
- Scott v. United States TrustNinth Circuit· 2005-06-16
- legalzoom.com, Inc. v. N. Carolina State BarNorth Carolina Business Court· 2014-03-24
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.