Skip to main content
· 3/28/2006

Gould v. Clippard

Citations

  • 340 B.R. 861
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21266
  • 2006 WL 861379

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \all Section 110 matters are core proceedings because such matters arise in Title 11.\
  • holding that \all Section 110 matters are core proceedings because such matters arise in Title 11.\
  • holding that BPPs defending litigation for violations of § 110 are not entitled to a jury trial because actions under that statute are core proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trauger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.