· 3/28/2006
Gould v. Clippard
Citations
- 340 B.R. 861
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21266
- 2006 WL 861379
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \all Section 110 matters are core proceedings because such matters arise in Title 11.\
- holding that \all Section 110 matters are core proceedings because such matters arise in Title 11.\
- holding that BPPs defending litigation for violations of § 110 are not entitled to a jury trial because actions under that statute are core proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Trauger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.