In re M.K.
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 4537
Syllabus
JUVENILE DELINQUENCY – SUSPENDED COMMITMENT – DUE PROCESS – CONFINEMENT CREDIT: The juvenile court properly credited the juvenile for time served where the juvenile received credit for the case under which he was confined. The juvenile received sufficient notice that the suspended commitments in two cases were subject to being imposed where the magistrate notified him, prior to the hearing at which they were imposed, that the commitments were subject to imposition, and the state filed motions to invoke the continuing jurisdiction of the court in those cases. The minimum commitment imposed by the juvenile court in one of the juvenile's cases was proper because the juvenile received proper notice and because the ordered minimum was not arbitrary or unreasonable.
Judges: Bergeron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- State v. FugateOhio Supreme Court· 2008-03-06· cited 209×
- In re J.V.Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-10-30· cited 88×
- In re D.S.Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-11-29· cited 58×
- In re H.V.Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-03-13· cited 44×
- In re D.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-27· cited 9×
- In re J.C.E.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-21· cited 7×
- State v. GuytonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-10· cited 4×
- In re R.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-25· cited 4×
- In re A.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-26· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.