District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 6/24/1993
In Re Mintz
Citations
- 626 A.2d 926
- 1993 D.C. App. LEXIS 154
- 1993 WL 225541
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting cases in which court imposed fitness requirement in cases involving “gross and persistent negligence of client matters”
- noting cases in which court imposed fitness requirement in cases involving “gross and persistent negligence of client matters”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Ferren, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-12-29· cited 98×
- In Re LylesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-18· cited 29×
- In re BradleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-07-11· cited 21×
- In Re OntellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-02-18· cited 10×
- In re Rodriguez-QuesadaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-08-13· cited 10×
- In Re DruryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-10-10· cited 9×
- In Re DietzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-01-30· cited 8×
- In Re HallalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-03-27· cited 5×
- In Re SteinbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-07-07· cited 4×
- In Re MarlowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-01-26· cited 4×
- In re MulkeenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-02-24· cited 3×
- In re Nathaniel H. SpeightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-07-26· cited 1×
- IN RE JUAN LORENZO RODRIGUEZ-QUESADADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-08-13
- In re LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-06-06
- In re ButlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-08-07
- In re Butler (Amended)District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-08-25
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-12-31· cited 140×
- In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-01-28· cited 118×
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-07-16· cited 71×
- In Re PeekDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-11-03· cited 41×
- In Re ReidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-04-20· cited 33×
- Matter of AlexanderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-07-31· cited 24×
- Matter of SheehyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-01-07· cited 24×
- In Re LarsenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-04-12· cited 22×
- Matter of MulkeenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-05-22· cited 19×
- In Re RichardsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-01-17· cited 15×
- In Re ChadwickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-01-31· cited 14×
- In Re TinsleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-12-03· cited 12×
- In Re DelateDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-10-08· cited 11×
- In Re YoumansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-04-16· cited 11×
- In re ChadwickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-05-15· cited 3×
- In re MintzSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1992-01-21· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.